Is there a natural topology on the set of open sets?

Let’s find an answer to "Is there a natural topology on the set of open sets?". The most accurate or helpful solution is served by mathoverflow.net.

There are ten answers to this question.

Best solution

Is there a natural topology on the set of open sets ...

... $ can one assign a natural topology to ... The intersection of a compact set of open sets is again ... Is there a natural topology on the set of open sets ?

mathoverflow.net

Other solutions

Do you need topology or algebra to come to a conclusion about the cardinality of a set?

For example, suppose you want to show R (the reals) is uncountable. One famous proof is based on Cantor's diagonal reasoning. But to use it you must know every real number has a decimal representation, actually you have to work not on R but on the field...

Answer:

There is something that needs to be pointed out here: all topological and algebraic notions can be enterely...

Read more

Steiner at Yahoo! Answers Mark as irrelevant Undo

The interior Ǻ of a set A is the union of all open sets included in A?? Maths help?

The interior Ǻ of a set A is the union of all open sets included in A a) prove that, for any set A, its interior Ǻ is open. b) prove that, for any set A, we have Ǻ ⊆ L(A) Please explain :)

Answer:

a) To prove this, we need to show that for any a in int(A), there is an open set S such that a is in...

Read more

May at Yahoo! Answers Mark as irrelevant Undo

So, if there is an infinite set I and it is described as a set of sets, what can we say about the nature of all element sets--they all can be open or all have to be closed or some have to be both?

please think on the lines of function f to be defined on each set such that it is complex valued and has k continuous differentials.

Answer:

You can't really say, The topology is independent from the base set. I could say only the whole set...

Read more

James Waddington at Quora Mark as irrelevant Undo

Is the pre-open set form a topology?

A is pre open iff A subset of interior of A clouser

Answer:

No.

Read more

s topology at Yahoo! Answers Mark as irrelevant Undo

More sets, fewer reps per set or fewer sets, more reps?

Help me plan my (somewhat pathetic) workouts! I've been on the hack diet for nine months, and have lost lots of weight (65 down, have another 15 or so to go). I also started doing the exercise program recommended in the diet, though I've substituted...

Answer:

Is there a reason you're doing calisthenics and not lifting weights? Calisthenics aren't bad for you...

Read more

maxwelton at Ask.Metafilter.Com Mark as irrelevant Undo

How Can I fix the Microsoft Lync 2013 Installation Topology Error?

If you encounter the Microsoft Lync 2013 Installation topology error, here is your fix. Installing Lync Server 2013: Topology File Share Error Fix Today, the FortressITX engineers came across an issue with Microsoft Lync 2013. While installing the program...

Answer:

The errors generated in the topology log are very generic: These errors have no detail and are useless...

Read more

Michael Peralta at Quora Mark as irrelevant Undo

In machine learning, is it better to train your model iteratively across several training/validation sets or is it better to just include all the data in your training set the first time and feed that through the model and why?

By "train your model iteratively across several training/validation sets," I mean split original training set into several data sets, train on remaining training records, predict on validation set 1, append the predicted values to validation...

Answer:

I'm not sure how you would be able to determine how good your model was from this.  Certainly you would...

Read more

Ralph Winters at Quora Mark as irrelevant Undo

Why is the concept of the set of all sets contradictory?

I read that the set of all sets is a contradictory concept. I thought about this. If U is such set, then U must be an element of U (not only that U is - of course- a subset of U, but that U belongs to U like 2 belongs the reals). Though this sounds kinda...

Answer:

One needs to be careful with words here: let's say that a "set", properly defined, is a collection...

Read more

Taty at Yahoo! Answers Mark as irrelevant Undo

Can one reasonably construct an argument that makes a statement about a set's elements based on matched cardinality without taking into account that sets of equal cardinality aren't necessarily themselves equal?

Sets of equal cardinality aren't necessarily themselves equal, so that it is possible to construct two sets of equal cardinality with one having an infinite number of elements more than the other. Can one reasonably construct an argument that makes a...

Answer:

If two sets have the same cardinality, then neither one has more elements than the other.  That's the...

Read more

Justin Rising at Quora Mark as irrelevant Undo

Related Q & A:

Just Added Q & A:

Find solution

For every problem there is a solution! Proved by Solucija.

  • Got an issue and looking for advice?

  • Ask Solucija to search every corner of the Web for help.

  • Get workable solutions and helpful tips in a moment.

Just ask Solucija about an issue you face and immediately get a list of ready solutions, answers and tips from other Internet users. We always provide the most suitable and complete answer to your question at the top, along with a few good alternatives below.